Add blog post about #322
This commit is contained in:
Nick
Pete Johanson
parent
698c27ba3b
commit
274fdec783
1 changed files with 195 additions and 0 deletions
195
docs/blog/2020-10-03-bootloader-fix.md
Normal file
195
docs/blog/2020-10-03-bootloader-fix.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: Fixing the Mysterious Broken Bootloader
|
||||
author: Nick Winans
|
||||
author_title: Contributor
|
||||
author_url: https://github.com/Nicell
|
||||
author_image_url: https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/9439650
|
||||
tags: [bootloader, keyboards, firmware, oss, ble]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Recently I was able to fix the "stuck in the bootloader" issue in
|
||||
[#322](https://github.com/zmkfirmware/zmk/pull/322) that had been plaguing us
|
||||
for quite some time. I want to go over what the issue was, how the issue was
|
||||
diagnosed, and how it was fixed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Background
|
||||
|
||||
What exactly is the "stuck in the bootloader" issue? Seemingly randomly, users'
|
||||
keyboards would suddenly stop working and when they would reset their keyboard
|
||||
they would get put into the bootloader instead of back into the firmware. This
|
||||
would require the user to re-flash the firmware again to get into the firmware.
|
||||
That wouldn't be so bad except for the fact that once this occurs, every reset
|
||||
would require the user to re-flash the firmware again. The only way to really
|
||||
fix this issue was to re-flash the bootloader itself, which is a huge pain.
|
||||
|
||||
Going into this, all we knew was that this issue was most likely introduced
|
||||
somewhere in the [#133](https://github.com/zmkfirmware/zmk/pull/133), which
|
||||
added Bluetooth profile management. We've had quite a few attempts at trying to
|
||||
recreate the issue, but we never were able to get it to happen consistently.
|
||||
|
||||
## Diagnosing the issue
|
||||
|
||||
This issue had been happening sporadically for the past month, and I finally
|
||||
decided to dig in to see what was going on. We started in the Discord and
|
||||
discussed what was common between all of the people who have experienced this
|
||||
issue. Everyone who had this issue reported that they did quite a bit of profile
|
||||
switching. This lined up with the possible connection to the Bluetooth profile
|
||||
management pull request.
|
||||
|
||||
### Pinpointing the cause
|
||||
|
||||
I had a hunch that this was related to the settings system. The settings system
|
||||
is used by profile Bluetooth switching, and the settings system works directly
|
||||
with the system flash. Based on this hunch, I tried spamming the RGB underglow
|
||||
cycle behavior on my main keyboard. Sure enough after a couple minutes, I got
|
||||
stuck in the bootloader. I was even able to reproduce it again.
|
||||
|
||||
This was an important discovery for two reasons. First, I was able to recreate
|
||||
the issue consistently, which meant I could set up logging and more closely
|
||||
monitor what the board was doing. Second, this more or less proved that it was
|
||||
specifically the settings system at fault. Both Bluetooth profile switching and
|
||||
RGB underglow cycling trigger it, and the one common piece is they save their
|
||||
state to settings.
|
||||
|
||||
### Settings system overview
|
||||
|
||||
To understand what's going wrong, we first need to understand how the settings
|
||||
system works. Here's a diagram to explain the flash space that the settings
|
||||
system holds for our nRF52840 based boards (nice!nano, nRFMicro, BlueMicro).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The settings flash space lives at the end of the flash of the chip. In this case
|
||||
it starts at `0xF8000` and is `0x8000` bytes long, which is 32KB in more
|
||||
comprehensible units. Then due to the chip's architecture, this flash space is
|
||||
broken into pages, which are `0x1000` bytes in size (4KB).
|
||||
|
||||
The backend that carries out the settings save and read operation in ZMK is
|
||||
called NVS. NVS calls these pages sectors. Due to how flash works, you can't
|
||||
write to the same bytes multiple times without erasing them first, and to erase
|
||||
bytes, you need to erase the entire sector of flash. This means when NVS writes
|
||||
to the settings flash if there's no erased space available for the new value, it
|
||||
will need to erase a sector.
|
||||
|
||||
### Logging discoveries
|
||||
|
||||
So first I enabled logging of the NVS module by adding
|
||||
`CONFIG_NVS_LOG_LEVEL_DBG=y` to my `.conf` file. I repeated the same test of
|
||||
spamming RGB underglow effect cycle and the resulting logs I got were this:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[00:00:00.000,671] <inf> fs_nvs: 8 Sectors of 4096 bytes
|
||||
[00:00:00.000,671] <inf> fs_nvs: alloc wra: 3, f70
|
||||
[00:00:00.000,671] <inf> fs_nvs: data wra: 3, f40
|
||||
// A bunch of effect cycle spam
|
||||
[00:02:34.781,188] <dbg> fs_nvs: Erasing flash at fd000, len 4096
|
||||
// A bunch more effect cycle spam
|
||||
[00:06:42.219,970] <dbg> fs_nvs: Erasing flash at ff000, len 4096
|
||||
// A bunch more effect cycle spam
|
||||
// KABOOM - bootloader issue
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
So at start up, we can see that the 8 sectors of 4KB are found by NVS properly,
|
||||
however, I wasn't sure what the second and third lines meant, but we'll get back
|
||||
to that. Nonetheless the next two logs from NVS showed erasing the sector at
|
||||
`0xFD000` and then erasing the `0xFF000` sector.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
It's really odd that the third to last sector and the last sector are erased,
|
||||
and then shortly after the bootloader issue is hit. I really had no explanation
|
||||
for this behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
### Reaching out to Zephyr
|
||||
|
||||
At this point, I nor anyone else working on the ZMK project knew enough about
|
||||
NVS to explain what was going on here. [Pete
|
||||
Johanson](https://github.com/petejohanson), project founder, reached out on the
|
||||
Zephyr Project's Slack (ZMK is built on top of Zephyr if you weren't aware).
|
||||
Justin B and Laczen assisted by first explaining that those `alloc wra` and
|
||||
`data wra` logs from earlier are showing what data NVS found at startup.
|
||||
|
||||
More specifically, `data wra` should be `0` when it first starts up on a clean
|
||||
flash. As we can see from my earlier logging on a clean flash I was instead
|
||||
getting `f40`. NVS is finding data in our settings sectors when they should be
|
||||
blank! We were then given the advice to double check our bootloader.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Adafruit nRF52 Bootloader
|
||||
|
||||
Most of the boards the contributors of ZMK use have the [Adafruit nRF52
|
||||
Bootloader](https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_nRF52_Bootloader), which allows
|
||||
for extremely easy flashing by dragging and dropping `.uf2` files onto the board
|
||||
as a USB drive. Every bootloader takes up a portion of the flash, and in the
|
||||
README explains that the first `0x26000` is reserved for the bootloader with the
|
||||
nRF52840, and we've properly allocated that.
|
||||
|
||||
However, there isn't a full explanation of the flash allocation of the
|
||||
bootloader in the README. There's a possibility that the bootloader is using
|
||||
part of the same flash area we're using. I reached out on the Adafruit Discord,
|
||||
and [Dan Halbert](https://github.com/dhalbert) pointed me towards the [linker
|
||||
map](https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_nRF52_Bootloader/blob/master/linker/nrf52840.ld)
|
||||
of the nRF52840. Let's take a look.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
FLASH (rx) : ORIGIN = 0xF4000, LENGTH = 0xFE000-0xF4000-2048 /* 38 KB */
|
||||
|
||||
BOOTLOADER_CONFIG (r): ORIGIN = 0xFE000 - 2048, LENGTH = 2048
|
||||
|
||||
/** Location of mbr params page in flash. */
|
||||
MBR_PARAMS_PAGE (rw) : ORIGIN = 0xFE000, LENGTH = 0x1000
|
||||
|
||||
/** Location of bootloader setting in flash. */
|
||||
BOOTLOADER_SETTINGS (rw) : ORIGIN = 0xFF000, LENGTH = 0x1000
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Here's a diagram to show this a bit better.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
We've found the issue! As you can see from the red bar (representing our
|
||||
settings flash area), we've put the settings flash area _right on top_ of the
|
||||
Adafruit bootloader's flash space. Oops!
|
||||
|
||||
This also shines some light on why NVS erased `0xFD000` and `0xFF000` sectors.
|
||||
It's possible there was no flash written to `0xFD000` because the bootloader
|
||||
didn't use up all of that space it has, and then there possibly weren't any
|
||||
bootloader settings set yet, so `0xFF000` could be used and erased by NVS too.
|
||||
|
||||
After erasing `0xFF000`, NVS probably next erased a rather important part of the
|
||||
bootloader that resulted in this issue at hand. In my opinion, we're pretty
|
||||
lucky that it didn't delete an even more vital part of the bootloader. At least
|
||||
we could still get to it, so that we could re-flash the bootloader easily!
|
||||
|
||||
## The solution
|
||||
|
||||
Now that we've found the issue, we can pretty easily fix this. We'll need to
|
||||
move the settings flash area back so that it doesn't overlap with the
|
||||
bootloader. First we calculate the size of the of flash area the bootloader is using.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
0x100000 (end of flash) - 0x0F4000 (start of bootloader) = 0xC000 (48KB)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
So the bootloader is using the last 48KB of the flash, this means all we need to
|
||||
do is shift back the settings area and code space `0xC000` bytes. We'll apply
|
||||
this to all of the `.dts` files for the boards that were affected by this issue.
|
||||
|
||||
```diff
|
||||
code_partition: partition@26000 {
|
||||
label = "code_partition";
|
||||
- reg = <0x00026000 0x000d2000>;
|
||||
+ reg = <0x00026000 0x000c6000>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
- storage_partition: partition@f8000 {
|
||||
+ storage_partition: partition@ec000 {
|
||||
label = "storage";
|
||||
- reg = <0x000f8000 0x00008000>;
|
||||
+ reg = <0x000ec000 0x00008000>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
And with those changes, we should no longer run into this issue! In the process
|
||||
of these changes, we lost 48KB of space for application code, but we're only
|
||||
using around 20% of it anyways. 🎉
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue